Talk:Fantasy of manners

This article was nominated for deletion on December 23, 2005. The result of the discussion was move to Fantasy of manners.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

A Song of Ice and Fire?

By the description, it would seem to me that George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series would fit into this genre. But I'm unsure. Does anyone agree? If not, why not? SpectrumDT (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that series is more heroic fantasy; the kind of social punctilio and battle-of-wit that enliven a fantasy of manners are not what Martin's series are about. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for name?

There's no explanation given at all for why this is called "fantasy" of manners other than one or two sources using the term for no apparent reason whatsoever, and the label appears rather dubious with the total lack of any supernatural elements or violations of consensus reality. Could it be that some mood of surreality, grotesqueness, or social tensions is meant, rather? --79.193.27.76 (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because this is a subgenre of fantasy fiction? --Orange Mike | Talk 19:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

how about at least a few examples?

Hey, I would add examples myself but I don't know any. The list of authors is great but most of them have tons of books and I'm guessing only a few of them are fantasy of manners. So if anyone can do it, please add some examples of works that fall under this category.Gigei (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fantasy of manners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060104024817/http://www.christianfantasy.net/towerofivory/articles/teinterview.html to http://www.christianfantasy.net/towerofivory/articles/teinterview.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]