Talk:Fantastic Four (1997 video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Comics: Marvel Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Loading Game

This article makes no mention of the fact that the game had a loading game which you played when levels were loading. This was a feature that was much appreciated and I know of many people who wish modern games did the same. I recall even reviews saying how bad Fantastic Four was and that the one redeeming factor was the loading game (a racing game) was better than the actual game itself. Abrynkus 17:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the X/O manowar game

This article says that that game was popular, raising hopes for this one, which didn't do so well. However, THAT game's article says it was widely panned. Which is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 04:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]