Talk:Falta Amor (song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Since this nom is nearly three months old, it is very appropriate to be wiped out currently! --K. Peake 10:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Add the animated video for the solo version alongside the main and if you can't, place solely this one in external links
- "A solo version of the song was" → "A solo version was" since no album or anything else is mentioned previously
- "to re-record the track." → "to re-record the song."
- "by Torres and Rengifo." → "by the former two."
- "it is about a man" → "the song speaks of a man"
- "The track received" → "The song received"
- Mention that it was certified by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)
- "grieve a detached love" → "mourn a broken love" or something similar, to be less repetitive with the body
- "To promote the song," → "To promote "Falta Amor","
- "their own cover version" → "their own cover versions"
Background and release
[edit]- "Ten days later" → "10 days later" per MOS:NUM
- "mentioning it is set for release" → "mentioning it being set for release"
- [1][2] appear to be out of order per them not corresponding with the order of info
- "The album was released for" → "Fantasia was released for"
- Remove "on the album" after second track because this is implied
- Either remove PopSugar per WP:RSSM or replace with a reliable source that published the interview
- "and hoped there would still be a chance" → "and hoped for a chance" to avoid direct quoting so much
- "that he planned" → "that he had planned"
- "Yatra told the magazine about collaborating" → "Yatra said about collaborating" because we already know this is for the magazine
- "during an Instagram live:" → "on Instagram Live:" with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
- "It marked the first collaboration" → ""Falta Amor" marked the first collaboration"
- Remove comma after extended play
Music and lyrics
[edit]- Audio sample looks good!
- Remove wikilink on Latin pop
- "while its production was" → "The production was" as a new sentence with this and the length since the current one is too long
- Add a comma before which
- "is influenced by" → "was influenced by"
- "its emotion grows until" → "the emotion grows until"
Critical reception
[edit]- These reviews should be ordered by what the critics focused on specifically, placing the stuff mentioned in the lead first probably
- Remove wikilink on Rolling Stone
- Italicise Clarín
- "complimented its lyrics that" → "commented that the lyrics"
- Too much is quoted from LatinPop Brasil, so reword parts
- "on its own right, naming it a" → "in its own right, seeing a"
- "in the lyrical plane". He continued to praise its" → "in the lyrical plane", continuing by praising its"
- "were able to convey" → "managed to convey" per the translation of source
- Too much is quoted from Univision, so reword parts
Accolades
[edit]- Add after playlist "of the most streamed songs of the year."
Commercial performance
[edit]- "with most top 20s" → "with the most top 20s"
- Mention the date it was certified Latin platinum
- "Besides the United States," → "Besides the US," per MOS:US
Music videos
[edit]- Img looks good!
- "An accompanying animated video for the solo version" → "An animated music video for the solo version"
- "for the music video" → "for the collaboration's music video"
- "that the visual would be released simultaneously with the song's release" → "that it would be released simultaneously with the song"
- Again, either remove PopSugar quote per WP:RSSM or find a different source stating this
- "who do a choreography," → "who perform a choreography,"
- See earlier regarding these PopSugar quotes
- "Juan Vicente from Los 40 called it" → "Vicente called the music video"
Live performances and appearances in media
[edit]- Good
Track listing
[edit]- Good
Credits and personnel
[edit]- Good
Charts
[edit]- Good
Certifications
[edit]- Good
Release history
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score is very high at 58.1% for PopSugar ref, but that will be removed due to unreliability and there are no other high scores, making this criterion a pass
- Remove or replace ref 5 per WP:RSSM
- Ref 57 is a duplicate of ref 56
- Add the language parameter for ref 61
External links
[edit]- Remove the video since this is already in the infobox
Final comments and verdict
[edit]On hold until all of the issues are fixed; cruised through this one! --K. Peake 12:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: Thank you so much for devoting your time on it. It is always an honor for me to have my nominated-articles reviewed by you. I fixed all the issues and changed or removed content based on PopSugar with replacing other references, I hope I haven't missed anything. If I had, please tell me to fix it. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- @آرمین هویدایی: ✓ Pass time has come; the only problem was that more of the PopSugar quoting needed to be paraphrased, though I reworded the earlier area for you! --K. Peake 08:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- @آرمین هویدایی: ✓ Pass time has come; the only problem was that more of the PopSugar quoting needed to be paraphrased, though I reworded the earlier area for you! --K. Peake 08:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)