Talk:Fairyfly

A fact from Fairyfly appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 October 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that fairyflies include the smallest known insects, smaller than a single-celled Paramecium?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fairyfly.

Wikipedia

Insects: Hymenoptera Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Hymenoptera task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

Well then... this page could use a little work. Citations and a little clarity of discussion would be a good place to start - some of the text is incomprehensible. I'll do what I can when I get a moment, but I am currently working on other projects. Aderksen (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is actually a considerable touch of interesting trivia in here from older versions of the page. I do not know why they have not been adapted back into the current edition of this page. I'll be mining this as a resource - and looking over the relevant literature for corrections and citations. I'd be thrilled if someone else wanted to help work on this page. The Mymarids are an important group to biological control... Aderksen (talk) 23:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't fairyflies those little bugs with the blue fuzz? I see em alot in the warmer months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinkie Ding Dong (talk • contribs) 02:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good article

I came here after reading the following news story:

Yirka, Bob (December 1, 2011), "Entomologists discover first instance of intact neurons without nucleus - in fairy wasps", Physorg.com, retrieved 2011-12-01

I just wanted to say that this article was an enjoyable read and it is in a good state. Thanks for your efforts on this. Regards, RJH (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) I have expanded the article some more with the PhysOrg article. Cheers.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 07:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

new systematics

The genus Gonatocerus is recently splitted up in 14 genera (see also de:Genatocerini):

John T. Huber: World reclassification of the Gonatocerus group of genera (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Zootaxa, 3967, S. 1–184, 2015 doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3967.1.1

Maybe this should be mentioned in the article. Greetings --Josef Papi (talk) 13:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fairyfly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kubja link now resolves incorrectly

The link to the genus Kubja was dangling when it was added, but now points at an article about a minor figure from Hindu mythology (which is not a fairy fly). I'm not sure how these things are typically resolved. Ichoran (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If a name has a primary use as title of another article, then it's fixed by creating a disambiguation title for the taxonomic article - in this case, the wasp article will be Kubja (wasp), and I've fixed it. If "kubja" had instead been, say, an alternative spelling, or something other than the title of the article it linked to, then the taxonomic article would normally take precedence, and the other use would be disambiguated instead. Thanks for the heads up. Dyanega (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]