Talk:Fairfax County Parkway

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Virginia
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name change

Holly Knoll Drive (Rt 6220) to Algonkian Parkway, approved 7/10/06 by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors. Minutes are here. Search for "Holly Knoll" or "Algonkian Parkway". Although they do call Rte 7 "Lee Highway" but that's not right at all, so nevermind that. --MPD^{T / C} 08:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References needed for the following

I haven't found anything yet that specifically states that Virginia acquired land for the Outer Beltway. Could the corridor have been kept free by Reston's master plan? Probably not, since Reston doesn't go that far south. --NE2 05:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following opening dates should be narrowed down if possible:

I-66 to US 50
Stringfellow to Franklin Farm
Rolling to Pohick
Lee Chapel to SR 123
US 1 to Telegraph
Telegraph to Fullerton
Sugarland to SR 7

Some or all may be in the article "After 16 years, $620 million, parkway finally earns its name" from the Centreville Times, November 8, 2001. Can somebody in the area check it out? --NE2 22:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

State routes need to be changed to county routes.

All references need to be changed to county route. This is not a state maintained road.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Compctech (talk • contribs)

No, it's a secondary road, and is state-maintained. Virginia has no county roads. And please sign your comments. --MPD^{T / C} 01:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funding

I seem to recall that there was a bit of a fuss about the funding for this road because normally the counties have no authority to fund nor build roads (except for Arlington and Henrico counties) due to the way the Byrd Road Act is set up. Does anyone remember any of the details about that? It might be an appropriate paragraph somewhere because this road was an exception to the norm. 1995hoo (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signs haven't been changed yet

I drive the Parkway everyday, and no signs have been changed yet from 7100 to 286. Should we not change the numbers until the signs are actually changed, especially since the article says "signed as..."? We should at least mention this. They say it could be up to three months to change the signs. In OpenStreetMap we won't change the numbers until the signs actually change (not that some haven't tried, but others find a happy medium by adding it as "fut_ref=SR 286"). -- Joshdoe (talk) 01:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, keep it as is because Wikipedia displays technical information; this article is no exception. However, I don't think we should state it "signed as SR 286" yet... And just an update: I haven't seen any 286 signs as of 17 March 2012. 69.255.19.141 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any signs either. We shouldn't say it's signed as SR 286 until it's actually, well, signed as SR 286. Doctor Whom (talk) 02:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They've already started changing the shields... on Google Maps at least. 69.255.19.141 (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signs went up last night. — AKADriver ☎ 11:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As of 6 June, 286 North/South signs were posted on the ramps from VA 123 to the parkway, and there are 286 signs from 123 to US 50, as well as large median signs reading "Fairfax County Parkway NOW 286 Old 7100" --séain (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fairfax County Parkway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070803201605/http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/const-project.asp?ID=62 to http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/const-project.asp?ID=62
Attempted to fix sourcing for www.fairfaxcountyparkway.org/schedule.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fairfax County Parkway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150113214120/http://www.vdot.virginia.gov/newsroom/northern_virginia/2012/three_major_parkways_now56533.asp to http://www.vdot.virginia.gov/newsroom/northern_virginia/2012/three_major_parkways_now56533.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fairfax County Parkway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fairfax County Parkway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]