Talk:Fair Park/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

Should this article really include the comment that Fair Park has been called one of the "most spectacular places in the world" when the reference shows the comment is from the Friends of Fair Park rather than some independent unbiased authoritative source? My mother has called me the best looking guy in the world, but I think less biased sources in WIKI is appropriate. Colek98 (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

---

Someone with a knowledge of radio history should include a paragraph on WRR, located at Fair Park since the park opened. --Michael K. Smith 20:37, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

- WRR has its own Wikipedia page.

Images

I've uploaded several images at Commons:Category:Fair Park; they are photos I took in January 1994. I have no idea what's what; it would be great if someone who konws the park could go through and add better summaries, and possibly appropriate categories. - Jmabel | Talk 02:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair Park improvements?

2009 will be an exciting year for Fair Park, with many improvements planned (opening of the DART Green Line, upgrading of the Esplanade, restoration of the Hall of State, and the return of "Contralto" and "Tenor", two amazing art deco statues that disappeared in the '30s). These would make a good addition to the article.

Jesteban78 (talk) 04:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Updates

I have been trying to update and organize the out-of-date pages for Fair Park. There is a lot of information that can be added about each of the structures in the park. I also have some new photos to upload.

Dfwcre8tive (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Kudos on all the work you've done here. NThomas (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Fair Park/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The page has plenty of good content but it isn't exactly smooth. There needs to be more structure and more discussion on history, separate (minor) headers for museums there, etc. drumguy8800 C T 06:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 06:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 14:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)