Talk:Fact and Value

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is this significant?

Yes, there are Festschrifts. I'm curious what makes this one worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Sunyataivarupam (talk) 08:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The point about Soble's criteria for a Festschrift is potentially interesting (assuming the criteria are interesting) but a reader would be more likely to look for this information in the Festschfit article, where it in fact does appear. Sunyataivarupam (talk) 22:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]