Jump to content

Talk:EuroBasket 2009

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:FIBA EuroBasket 2009)

FYROM/Macedonia dispute

[edit]

We appear to be having an editing dispute between someone who wants "Macedonia" to appear as "FYROM" and not the neater looking  North Macedonia. I believe that the former is better for the article as a whole. --Differentgravy (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically they play as FYR Macedonia in the tournament, as with all sports competitions that Greece also takes part in. Neutrality would prescribe FYR Macedonia as the full name and MKD as the abbreviation. But who gives a fuck. MaledictusLXIX (talk) 00:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have a guideline for this issue: WP:NCMAC. We use plain "Macedonia". Fut.Perf. 22:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I defecate inside you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.155.156.226 (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that,it is reported that during the match between Republic of Macedonia and Geece,the Greek national broadcaster decided to delete the abreviation MKD that is used for our country.This caused major concern in Macedonia.Youtube video is available,and I think Greece will have a penalty this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.173.237 (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, we should do something to stop somebody, who changes Macedonia name Monkeydonia, somebody really hates this team. Larfingas (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

new map

[edit]

now that the additional qualifying round is over, the map has to be updated to include just the participating nations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.64.102.186 (talk) 13:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goaldifference...

[edit]

It doesn't make sence to write the goal difference, because the goal quotient is used. --93.132.39.250 (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The head-to-head-results are used! It's all but impossible, that the overall goal quotient comes into account.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More than 2 team leaders

[edit]

Is it really necessary to list the team leader for points, rebounds, or assists on the box score for the game? It just looks clunky, and most of the time the total is not particularly memorable. For instance, does anyone care about the names of the 7 Macedonians who had 1 assist in the game against France or the 3 Croatians who had 3 assists in the game against Russia? Bds69 (talk) 02:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, how do you decide when to put an article on semi-protection? It gets old when IP addresses change Macedonia three times a day and the Bulgarian fans seem to have something against Earl Rowland and keep changing his information.
I think we should list those players. And you can go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if you want. --Turkish Flame 05:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As a rule of thumb, when the line for a particular stat wraps, we'd just say "Asts: 7 others, 1". –Howard the Duck 03:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Or you guys can split this article into EuroBasket 2009 preliminary round, EuroBasket 2009 eighth-final round and EuroBasket 2009 knockout round if you like. –Howard the Duck 05:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, if one line from the statline wraps, better say "7 players with x each." There's no sense for listing a team game high when 7 players all got 1 each. –Howard the Duck 13:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. --Tone 16:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:FIBA EuroBasket which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EuroBasket 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on EuroBasket 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]