Talk:FC Barcelona/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: I found and fixed two dead links using WP:CHECKLINKS diff

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I made a number of copy-edits to imporve grammar, coherenece and style.diff
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References check out, I fixed two dead links, all sources support statements, all sources appear reliable. I assume good faith for off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Through, detailed and concise
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Page is protected to prevent vandalism
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Images are licensed or tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have no hesitation in passing this interesting article as a worthy of GA status. If you wish to take this further to WP:FAC you may need to add alt etxt to the images and proviode citations for all statistics. I could confirm the majoroity of the stats through my own offline sources, but further evidence may need to be provided at FAC. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]