Talk:FA

Red links

This page looks terrible to me. I'm thinking most of those red links will never get articles and thus should be removed. My plan is to move them all here and then those that do need real articles can be moved back as those articles are written. Please let me know if you see any better course of action. Tedernst | talk 07:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd much rather leave the red links as they currently stand. They don't jar much, and serve to prompt potential contributors into action.

Urhixidur 17:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

They jar me quite a bit. Do you see any way to break this down into categories? Or even just re-ordering so the redlinks are further down (I tried this before and was reverted)? Tedernst | talk 18:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Football Association be nearer the top, alphabetisation be damned?Londo06 18:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is FA in Wikipedia?

As used, for example, here [[1]] where it is assumed that everyone should understand? 90.201.187.50 (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the benefit of future readers with the same question: FA means "featured article", i.e. one of the best pages on Wikipedia. WP:FA has more details. Typing WP:term in the search box explains many Wikipedia jargon terms. Certes (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup needed

I am not at all sure all these are reasonably referred to with FA. There are zillions of two-letter f.a. terms. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]