Talk:Extra Life (band)

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Brooklyn may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comment

I have to go soon, but I will definitely explain the notability later today. I'm impressed with how fast you put in the speedy deletion tag btw. There's plenty of reviews out there, the band has connections with another notable band, and they're incredibly unique. The medieval vocals and awkward rhythms are a notable feature. Also they were recommended by Battles if that helps. From the dusted magazine review: "Every so often there's a record so accomplished that it makes most albums of its type sound ridiculous, and Secular Works is one of those" Pwrong (talk) 01:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that all material on Wikipedia must be verified by reliable sources. A MySpace page is not by any means a reliable source, and "Dusted magazine" may not be either. The relevant policies are WP:RS and WP:V. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a list somewhere of reliable sources for music articles? Or some way to determine whether a source is reliable? Dusted Magazine has a wikipedia article, so does Stereogum and Rate Your Music.Pwrong (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]