Talk:Extended periodic table (detailed cells)

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 November 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

The g block is 2 elements too long

The g-block for period 8 should be 18 elements long, not 20 as this illustration shows. Elements 139 and 140 belong in group 13 and 14, respectively, followed by elements 169-172. Compare this to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pekka_Pyykkö and to the original source DOI: 10.1039/C0CP01575J. Blocks increase by double an odd number, thus s = 2*1 = 2, p = 2*3 = 6, d = 2*5 = 10, f = 2*7 = 14, g = 2*9 = 18. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:C5A0:9400:9D16:96A1:48D2:B214 (talk) 03:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are many reasonable ways to draw the eighth period, but given that there is not expected to be much of a chemical difference between E139 and E140 and the other superactinides, tagging them along to the 5g row as Fricke and Nefedov do seems more chemically sensible. Double sharp (talk) 03:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extended periodic table (large version). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080213082719/http://www.iupac.org/didac/Didac%20Eng/Didac01/Content/S01.htm to http://www.iupac.org/didac/Didac%20Eng/Didac01/Content/S01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sc, Y, place

Based on https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=920, periodic table shall have Sc, Y above Lu, Lr by the most current version. Please check this version. Thanks.Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk) 00:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G-block?

If s hold 2, p hold 6, d hold 10, and f hold 14, then g hold 18. I think 168 is in noble gas. -198.111.211.2 (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 5g orbitals indeed hold 18 electrons, but because of the relativistic collapse of 8s and 8p_1/2, by the time you get to the 7d elements the covering s-shell is 9s instead of 8s, and in the 8p elements the six p-electrons come from 9p_1/2 (two) and 8p_3/2 (four) together. So we have to add in four extra electrons from 9s and 9p_1/2 before we get to the noble gas at 172. See the main extended periodic table article. Double sharp (talk) 04:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]