Talk:Extended System Configuration Data
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Extended System Configuration Data article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Unnamed section
[edit]Actually ESCD data is/was usually located within flash memory, not in CMOS (the latter is too limited in size). --Zac67 (talk) 21:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Source? You're probably thinking of the 50/64 bytes of the original AT CMOS RAM, but subsequent systems had much more CMOS RAM. The The Plug & Play Book (p. 22) says "The Extended System Configuration Data (ESCD) area is an 8-KB block of additional CMOS RAM." Someone not using his real name (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- The Plug and Play System Architecture book (p. 258) says: "As an alternative method, the BIOS may implement functions 41h, 42h, and 43h. These functions support the ESCD (extended system configuration data) method of storing the resource usage information in non-volatile memory. The resource usage is tracked for each individual device. The amount of non-volatile memory consumed is greater (typically 2-4KB), but the system has greatly enhanced ability to resolve resource usage problems. A separate specification, the ESCD spec, details the exact format of the information stored in non-volatile memory. Detailed coverage of the ESCD specification is outside the scope of this book." So I'm guessing the actual amount of storage and its location might be implementation specific. It seems only the BIOS functions were standardized. Someone not using his real name (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- As far as I know, this is the case. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- A lot of computer specs talk about ESCD 1.03 support. But I can find the spec nowhere. Can anyone share a link to the 1.03 spec? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DynoFu (talk • contribs) 21:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Computer hardware articles
- Unknown-importance Computer hardware articles
- Stub-Class Computer hardware articles of Unknown-importance
- Automatically assessed Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Wikipedia requested images of technology