Talk:Experty.by
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability tag
[edit]I've gone through the first quarter of the sources and am concerned that I'm not sure I see any independent coverage in them, as they all appear to be either interviews or PR. I'm rather disinclined to go through 34 more given the quality of the first few. Pr12402, could you identify 2 or 3 citations here that actually have significant independent coverage of the subject and thus establish notability? signed, Rosguill talk 06:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- №№ 16, 17, 28, 32, 37, 38, 43, 44, 45 from the revision (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Experty.by&oldid=939256662). 👀 I'm going to add some more high profile reports from Sovetskaya Belorussiya – Belarus' Segodnya (https://www.google.com/search?q=experty.by+site:sb.by&rlz=1C5CHFA_enBY608BY608&ei=pI46XrztH-zzqwGIrargBg&start=10&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwi8z7eYkLrnAhXs-SoKHYiWCmwQ8tMDegQICxAv&biw=1680&bih=877&dpr=2) ASAP too, so the highlighted numbers are valid just as to the named revision. -- pr12402, 5 February, 2020
- Thanks, those seem adequate. signed, Rosguill talk 18:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)