Talk:Exotheology

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Prod

Three references to major news media should be sufficient. Prod removed. -Arb. (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The result of the discussion is: not merge.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose that Exotheology be merged into Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact. I think that the content in the Exotheology article can easily be explained in the context of Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact, and the Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Exotheology will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Srinivasasha (talk) 06:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the point;

the target article is a bloated list already that would benefit from splitting
this article is not just about "potential impact" but about theological speculation that goes on now and in the past; you could say that the existence of exotheology today would reduce the theological impact of proof of extraterrestrial life to nil.

But then if you go ahead and merge this anyway, it will not be the end of the world either. --dab (𒁳) 05:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I don't see any need to merge the articles. This article is about religion and Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact is far more general. Leave articles as they are. David J Johnson (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exotheology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090220145808/http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/technology/science/science/story.html?id=fa0c5620-4d7f-44e6-9436-5cd4cb7153ac to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/technology/science/science/story.html?id=fa0c5620-4d7f-44e6-9436-5cd4cb7153ac

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AlexxisBreanna (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Therealalejandrodiaz.

— Assignment last updated by Jad Mada (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen White's belief in "Unfallen Worlds"

I'm surprised nobody here has mentioned Ellen G. White from the Adventist movement in the late 1800s who often spoke of many unfallen worlds in her writings. 2601:989:4581:D0A0:D5A3:219B:DF65:9D1B (talk) 13:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]