Talk:Exoteric

This page was proposed for deletion by Carchasm (talk · contribs) on 7 September 2022.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Exoteric redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spirituality Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult

Untitled

I think we should add the meaning of the term exoteric in phrases like exoteric religeon , exoteric perspective , exoteric doctrine etc because all of them apear in various writings ,please see the external link that I added to this article and also [1] and[2].Pasha 11:45, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article makes very little sense. 71.124.41.41 23:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, now it makes sense. But it's still basically OR. --Otheus 21:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is still contradictory , and fails to capture the meaning of these concepts. A rewrite would be in order. 2 may 2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.17.7 (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addition and improvement of the article

Dear colleague from the English section of Wikipedia! Have you also noticed that the article doesn't make any sense, very little information and so vague, as if the topic is not covered? If «I» can't fix the article, who can? [A question everyone who reads these lines should ask themselves] (Thanks in advance for your participation). XMHNHMX (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]