Jump to content

Talk:Exorcism in Christianity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Exorcism in Christianity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistic error[edit]

In the section about the Old Testament this appears:

it relies on a reading of the Hebrew word "rûah" as "evil spirit".

That is not correct: "rûah" is translated as "spirit"; it is the companion word rā·‘āh that is where the issue lies. It is translated as "evil", "distressing", troubling", "harmful", or "tormenting" in this passage in various translations, and in other passages it is rendered also as "unsettling" or "wild". Its etymology is uncertain, but most connect it to the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", and thus the negative view.

I can't assess the citation to the Catholic Encyclopedia since the reference is not sufficiently specific to find the actual source. Without that, I just leave this note and won't attempt a change in the article. Dismalscholar (talk) 06:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]