This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Scout helicopters armed with SS.11 missiles were used in Hell Tank.
... that one British Army participant in 1967's Exercise Hell Tank, testing the use of helicopters against tanks, suggested the helicopters were 45-to-0 over the tanks? Source: 1st. the exact quote is "45-love"
Just a comment but I don't think linking helicopters and tanks is necessary here given they're common knowledge. Besides, ideally we'd want readers to learn about the tank and too many links may distract. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: If the image is to be used, it needs a better caption to tie it to whatever hook is used. New QPQ still needed. New hook options needed. I've suggested some potential directions.Seddontalk02:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ATL1 ... that a British Army participant in 1967's Exercise Hell Tank, testing the use of missile-firing helicopters, suggested the helicopters killed 45 tanks with no losses when the tanks attempted an offensive breakout?
All looking good. ALT 1 feels much clearer. QPQ done. Seddontalk 00:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC}
I really am sorry to approve this and then immediately open the nomination again. With the benefit of hindsight, this is a simple "person does their job" hook. Is there anything more interesting?--Launchballer03:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @Launchballer: I noticed this re-opening when I was reviewing the nom that Seddon used this as a QPQ for. I think that hook should be approved as highly interesting. That a British Army soldier publicly appraised helicopters–fairly frail and nascent things at the time–as overwhelmingly defeating heavily armored and armed tanks is a significant thing. This is not so much "man does job" as "event suggests paradigm shift". ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As there has been consensus at WT:DYK to halt the practice of unlimited workshopping of old nominations, and this is well over the two-month mark, I'm marking this nomination as rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]