Talk:Everybody (Backstreet's Back)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music High‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Ok, so it may have some sort of an infobox, but not the RIGHT one.

I wouldn't say Josie was Howie's companion - she looked more like his victim to me. In the video, he was Dracula and bit her neck. Dangstar 22:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar correction

I changed "appear" to "appears" in the sentence "while the band as a group appear..." because this article is about an American band, not a British band. If it were about a British band "appear" would be OK. What do you think? --Marce 11:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Everybody (Backstreet's Back)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The haunted house they are in looks VERY much like the house used in the film CASPER?! Anyone else noticed that?? lol :) GREAT VIDEO!

Last edited at 00:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Everybody (Backstreet's Back). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Everybody (Backstreet's Back). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rt100.ro/topul-anului-1997.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140326164250/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/pag-259376-Classements-Annuels.html?year=1997 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/pag-259376-Classements-Annuels.html?year=1997

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Constant single cover changes on the infobox

I don't understand why the earliest single cover should be the only one used in the infobox when both can be used to explain the different regional variants of the single. I don't think there is any rule on Wikipedia that suggests that only one cover can be used for the infobox. Any thoughts on this? Angryjoe1111 (talk) 10:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joe, a lot of singles, especially those of BSB, feature several covers, however that is not a rationale to unnecessarily include more than one. In this case, the earliest and most known cover is used. Thank you for starting the discussion, but I will go ahead and restore the previous cover, as it has been solely used in this article for over a decade now. QuestFour (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing your opinion on this discussion, but there has been several uses of alternate cover artworks used on other articles, such as three alternate covers on the Marshall Mathers LP, as well as an Australian and Japanese cover of Hormoaning. How have those covers not been removed by your standards, whilst a European single cover is an exception? The album template clearly doesn't state that the earliest use of an album cover should be used, so I do not understand your reasoning behind doing this. It also states that an extra album cover can be used that differs from the original and is widely distributed. The album cover used in the article further provides commentary that satisfies the template in question, whilst leaving the original cover intact. Just because an album cover has been used for a decade on an article doesn't mean that additional updates cannot be made. Thank you for contributing to this discussion, but there is no reason why duplicate album covers cannot be used to demonstrate the album's significance and the page will be reverted shortly. Feel free to respond if there are still any ongoing issues with my comments and changes. Angryjoe1111 (talk) 13:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it's related, but for some reason when I tried to put in the short description it says I changed it to ebo1.png ... not what I tried to do using short description helper at all .. ~~and I'm not about to try to change it again.~~ — Ched (talk) 18:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well it appears that it wasn't me; this is the edit that changed it, so I'm putting the short description back in. (not sure why the "your edit was reverted" link showed both edits as one) *shrugs* carry on folks - and good luck with your article and the infobox cover pic. — Ched (talk) 20:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's cool, thanks for your edit Angryjoe1111 (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]