Talk:Every Night (Hannah Diamond song)

Every Night (Hannah Diamond song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 12, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Every Night (Hannah Diamond song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 November 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "Every Night", released ten years ago today, was called "the smartest dumb music out there"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Every Night (Hannah Diamond song).

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that "Every Night", released ten years ago today, was called "the smartest dumb music out there"?

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2014/nov/28/the-playlist-electronic-james-blake-jackmaster-beats-in-space-and-more

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Marcia Moore (actress)
Comment: For November 24, 2024, if possible.

Created by Skyshifter (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

Skyshiftertalk 19:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Great hook! Might be a good candidate for the last/quirky hook. Article is well-sourced with online references; I verified the claim in the hook. Prose is neutral and well-worded; Earwig shows no copyvio. If I had to offer a minor critique, there's a bit of redundancy in the first paragraph of the Composition section: described is used twice in a row, then compared three times, and said two times after that, to attribute critic opinions. Perhaps the word choice could be varied a bit (eg using "called it", "labeled it", or "noted its production was similar to"). Nonetheless, the article is certainly DYK level already even without those edits! Frostly (talk) 07:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! Skyshiftertalk 22:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Every Night (Hannah Diamond song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 13:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 03:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Lead

Add how it was diamonds first billboard chart entry.

Done

Background

Nothing but the last line in the section seems relevent.

"It was written by A. G. Cook and Hannah Diamond, with Cook producing it" -> "It was written by A. G. Cook and Diamond. Cook additionally served as producer.

Added something similar

Composition

Alot of quotes, anyway to reduce this?

Reduced a bit, though I'm afraid of losing too much of the quotes' original meanings if I paraphrase too much. I believe the current number of quotes is acceptable.

Release and reception

Why is "The Forty-Five" reliable?

It was listed as reliable on WP:A/S following this discussion.

Misc

Infobox image has proper rational and infobox.

No talk page messages since a passed DYK two months ago.

Earwig detects around 12% similarty.

Archive all sources probably just use IA bot

IABot request sent, though it appears that it is down right now.

Dates are inconsistently formatted

I don't know if this was pointed as a problem, though it should be fine with the {{Use dmy dates}} at the top.

Spot checked 8 refs and everything lined up

@OlifanofmrTennant: done! Skyshiftertalk 11:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]