Talk:Evan Lysacek/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article, although I have listed a number of problems below. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is OK, a 6/10.

Lead is too short and does not adequately sum up the article. Expand to two full paragraphs with all relevant information.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

Early life and personal life are too short and are poorly written, please expand them to include all relevant information and write in full paragraphs, not stubby little one liners.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail: