Talk:European Student Moon Orbiter

'Blatent advertising' allegations

This article has been tagged for 'speedy deletion', as apparently it counts as 'blatent advertising'. I don't believe this to be the case, and have contested the tag.

You can read my justification for this article the talk page of the editor in question: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Blanchardb#European_Student_Moon_Orbiter

EPS Paul (talk) 17:25, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

19 or 20 teams?

In the first paragraph, it says that there are 19 teams, but there are 20 listed below. This is a blatant inconsistency, and I suppose it's meant to be 20.. This may have been caused as a new team has recently been added?

Willplatts (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, I changed it, since I noticed it also said 20 lower down as well.

Willplatts (talk) 09:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

There are currently 21 teams from 19 European universities participating in the project. The up-to-date information can be found on the ESMO pages from ESA's Education Office:
Altibel (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

References

Broken reference

Reference 2 is broken, but I'm not sure what to do about it. Willplatts (talk) 09:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

The ESA Education website moved a year ago, that article is now on: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Education/SEML0MPR4CF_0.html
Altibel (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Launch date

Launch date has been moved to late 2013 or early 2014.
Altibel (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Mission objectives

The mission objectives have been further specified and can be found on the ESMO pages from ESA.
Altibel (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Project management

In 2009 Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd (SSTL) was awarded a contract to manage the development and testing of the project.
Altibel (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

References

General description

On the general description of ESMO, the mass, volume, information on travel (3 months instead of direct transfer), payloads and technical facts are missing. These can also be found on the ESA ESMO pages.
Altibel (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Lunar transfer

Isn't it supposed to be Earth-Moon L1 Lagrange point, instead of Sun-Earth L1? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.52.96 (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Not according to the ESA website which says travel is via Sun-Earth L1, I see what you mean though as Earth-Moon L1 would make more sense, perhaps they got it wrong on their website? On a related note that information in the article is seemingly copy/pasted from the ESA website... ChiZeroOne (talk) 19:32, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

ESA concludes student ESMO Moon orbiter project

According to a news article on ESA's web site http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Education/SEMFX0KWZ0H_0.html, titled "ESA concludes student ESMO Moon orbiter project", the ESMO project will not proceed to the next project phase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxralf (talk • contribs) 16:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Student Moon Orbiter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100403055952/http://www.sstl.co.uk/Missions/Lunar_and_Interplanetary_Projects to http://www.sstl.co.uk/Missions/Lunar_and_Interplanetary_Projects

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)