Talk:Eureptilia

	Eureptilia is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reptilia vs Sauropsida

So the taxonomy box for this page links to Reptilia as being the parent group of Eureptilia, even though 1. that page does not use actual taxonomy and only lists all living groups of reptiles as its subgroups, 2. The Sauropsida page lists Eureptilia as one of its subgroups and does not include Reptilia, with the implication they're synonymou. I know the page itself for Reptilia has a taxonomy tree, but aside from it not being in the infobox it's identical to the one in Sauropsida (not to mention the Linnaean implications), so what's the point of including both of them in the taxonomy infobox for this page and Parareptilia? Admittedly I don't know if it would've been better to write this on the talk for one of the two parent groups or what the scientific consensus on the taxonomy here is; but whatever the solution may be, the way these articles are currently linked together definitely feels rather disjointed as it is. --Jessietail (talk) 23:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eureptilia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

What's going on with the intro? Primitive were all small, superficially lizard-like forms, that probably scurried through the Paleozoic undergrowth in search of insects. Does it mean to say: Eureptilia were all small, etc? Aboctok Aboctok (talk) 18:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]