Talk:Euphorbia abyssinica
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Euphorbia abyssinica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the latex-like sap of the desert candle has uses in traditional medicine as well as promoting the rooting of cuttings?
- ALT1:... that the latex-like sap of the desert candle has uses in traditional medicine but can cause skin blisters and blindness?
- Reviewed: Greeneye spurdog
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Peter coxhead (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 11:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC).
Article is new enough (5x expanded recently) and long enough, well-sourced and neutrally written; Earwig's tool only returned matches to species names, no copyvio detected. Both hooks are cited, interesting, and supported by the Oxford source. I have a slight preference for ALT1 in terms of interest but both will work. QPQ done, good to go! DanCherek (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)