Talk:Etymology of Wicca/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fiddlersmouth (talk · contribs) 17:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of making one minor grammatical correction. Otherwise the article is good. It is well laid out, and explains what it claims to describe in the title clearly, historically and in a logical order. The article clearly benefitted from the previous FA review.

I took a liberal view of the "illustrated, if possible, by images" guideline. I would question the relevance of the jewellery, and recommend finding a photograph of Gardner, Cunningham, the ubiquitous Farrars, or whatever you're having yourself, with a line explaining their contribution. Otherwise, well done, and I enjoyed reading it.

Fiddlersmouth (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]