Talk:Etymologicum Magnum

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Misleading/erroneous Article

The current article is highly misleading. The lexicon that for the past 500 years has been conventionally titled the "Etymologicum Magnum" is NOT the same work as the "Etymologicum Genuinum", nor is it known as such in classical scholarship, as the article states and the redirect implies.

The so-called Etymologicum Magnum is an extensive lexical compendium produced by an unknown compilator in the mid twelfth century. It was first published in 1499 and most recently ed. Thomas Gaisford (Oxford 1848).
The so-called Etymologicum Genuinum was only discovered in the nineteenth century in two tenth-century manuscripts. It was compiled at Constantinople in the mid ninth century. It remains for the most part unpublished.

Both titles are of course modern conventions (in fact, in the manuscripts the two works are identically titled "Mega Etymologikon"), but the article should follow these well-established conventions and not confuse readers; i.e. currently, a reader looking for an article on the Etymologicum Magnum is unwittingly directed to an article that is actually about the Etymologicum Genuinum, and which contains a link to the "real" Etymologicum Magnum styled, bizarrely, "Etymologicon Magnum".

The confusion has been compounded by the (uncompleted) edition of the Etymologicum Genuinum by F. Lasserre and N. Livadaras (1976- ). On the grounds that the Etymologicum Genuinum was an important source for the Etymologicum Magnum, Lasserre/Livadaras chose to style the Etymologicum Genuinum the "Etymologicum Magnum Genuinum" and the Etymologicum Magnum as "Etymologicum Magnum Auctum", but these designations have been overwhelmingly avoided/ignored by subsequent scholarship, partly because they somewhat misrepresent the Etymologicum Magnum as merely an expanded version of the Etymologicum Genuinum, and partly because they cause more confusion than they resolve. Recommend rewrite/correction of current articles and redirects for "Etymologicum Magnum" and "Etymologicon Magnum". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.135.106.213 (talk) 19:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Necessary revisions carried out 14/15 October 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.135.60.89 (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Etymologicum Magnum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100614072632/http://duke.edu/web/classics/grbs/FTexts/47/Rance.pdf to http://www.duke.edu/web/classics/grbs/FTexts/47/Rance.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]