The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2012. The result of the discussion was keep and improve.
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
It would be great if someone could construct a stub for this article. However, I think the best course of action in the mean time is to have a redirect. Thoughts? TippyGoomba (talk) 19:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'd recommend leaving this as a redirect; a stub will encourage user edits taking us down the same road. I've requested protection for the redirect to prevent this. I would recommend developing a stub/outline in the incubator so users can contribute to the new version there. Chris Troutman (talk)20:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like some users had political motivation. Seems like no one interest to improve the document by a new structure. Reverting back to original since we can't wait our entire life to see a new structure for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.163.53 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
