Talk:Ethisphere Institute

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

To Do: Link pages to here

I created this as as I wondered what sort of thing it was; there are many pages that refer to Ethisphere without being linked. It would be great if people found time to link them. PJTraill (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Do: More background wanted

I wonder if anyone can provide more information: news, criticisms, answers, organisation, connections etc. PJTraill (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Previous article deleted / why notable

I see on User_talk:Thendral_Muthusami#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Ethisphere_Institute that a previous article under this title (started at 12:57, 1 July 2010) was nominated for deletion, and, presumably deleted; I don’t know where the discussion – if any – is. Oddly enough, when I created the article, I saw no warning of the previous article.

It seems notable to me, as many companies refer (in Wikipedia and elsewhere) to their ranking by the Institute, so that one wants to know what sort of organisation it is, how it works, and how seriously one can take it. I therefore created the article supplying at least a start to providing that information.

It is also mentioned on Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/Companies and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/E13 (“academic”!?); Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/COIReports/2007,_Oct_10 also refers to a non-existent User:Ethisphere blocked on 2007-10-11T04:47:16, which could mean that there was a previous spammy form of the article, in which case I feel it a good thing that we replace that with a neutral and informative one.

PJTraill (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree. I myself got to this article because I was reading about Thrivent Financial for Lutherans and saw its ranking by Ethisphere Magazine mentioned, so I Googled that to see how reputable it was. Thus, this subject definitely seemed noteworthy to me, and this article at least provided the key piece of info I wanted to know (which is that Ethisphere Magazine is at least more substantial than just some local Lutheran magazine from the same area as Thrivent's HQ). BreakfastJr (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guff reverted

This was very reasonably tagged as sounding like a press release, being full of guff bigging up the company. I have therefore reverted it to the last serious revision (since then it was only editted to tag it and to date the tag). If User:Smarzec has anything useful to contribute they are welcome to add it in a neutral tone — but I doubt it, as this was their only contribution. Of course anyone else is also welcome to wade through their prose in search of encyclopaedic information. PJTraill (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Info about the organization is needed.

Specifically, the management of the organization needs to be explained, and, most importantly, the funding of the organization needs to be explained. Absent this information the organization could be a Russian gang or a front for US underworld organizations. drh (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]