Talk:Ethical regulator theorem

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 July 2017 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Computer science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Merge with Good regulator theorem?

The articles are strongly related, and both are currently too short and lack justification, in my opinion. They have in common that they use mathematical language without demonstrating sensible math. Even if the primary sources (which I have no time to check now) piece together good mathematical explanations, even worthy of the word "theorem" (something proven to be true within an axiomatic framework), these two articles appear more as philosophers playing with math to wrap their valuable perspectives in a more "scientific" gift paper - perhaps aiming them at those practicing AI and control engineering? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehasl (talk • contribs) 11:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The good regulator theorem is well established, but ethical regulator theorem less so. Makes sense to merge the articles.