Talk:Ethel

Merger discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to keep Ethel and Odal separate. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. These are two distinct pages, with only a couple of entries in common. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. The rune should be separate article.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

œ

It is one of the names of the œ. Please add this info and link it to the œ article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:9F7:ED1:3427:35BE (talk) 23:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]