Talk:Ethan Coleman

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Update

@GiantSnowman: Following on from our discussion on your talk page, which you've archived, and your suggestion we discuss the article here – to be fair, you say I removed your sources from the article, yet you did exactly that to my sources, which were here before yours. I know you've merged the histories so it now looks like the version you compiled in your userspace was the first version of this article, but when I started this page and introduced sources on 29 January, there was no previous version. There were no sources there for me to remove. I could never have been expected to know you had written about Coleman in your userspace and would consider that version so superior to the existing version that completely overwriting it was the only option open to you. This revisionist history concept of starting an article leaves a bad taste in my mouth, and I will certainly not bother starting any similar pages until I have checked your userspace for "superior versions".

That said, I see you've reintroduced most of my sources so that is to an extent resolved. More could and should be done but I have very little inspiration now to do more here or suggest more, so we'll leave it at that. Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I say you removed the sources, I mean you replaced an entire version (just as I did). However I'm glad my compromise looks acceptable. Giant Snowman 07:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]