Talk:Estonia–Ichkeria relations

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia

Estonia Low‑importance

Estonia–Ichkeria relations is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Russia: History / Politics and law / Chechnya Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Chechnya task force.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Representative office

In relation to this edit, the existence of a representative office does not imply, either de facto or de jure, whether one entity recognises another entity. Take for example http://www.abjasia.org.ve/, the "Permanent Mission" of Abkhazia in Venezuela. This had existed in Caracas from before the time that Venezuela extended actual recognition; it's existence in Caracas did not imply any type of recognition. Or http://www.nkrusa.org, which is the Nagorno Karabakh Republic representative office in the United States - its existence does not imply that the United States recognises (de facto) NKR's independence. Neither does Abkhazia having representative offices in the UK, Germany, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Italy, etc have any bearing on whether Abkhazia's independence is de facto recognised by any of those nations. The {{fact}} tag needs to be reinserted into the article, or the assertion removed as original research. --Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 20:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems now we are simply debating definitions in the English language. Does setting up a diplomatic office for an unrecognized country to negotiate with you not count as recognition of their existence, even if it isn't official. Even Russia is referred to by most as having "de facto recognized" Ichkeria in the 1997-9 period because the Khasavyurt treaty referred to the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria and the Russian Federation as equals. But, I suppose, so there's no confusion, it doesn't hurt to completely remove "de facto", and only refer to the office, which I will do momentarily.--Yalens (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]