Talk:Espanto II

Espanto II has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Espanto II is part of the Los Espantos series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 13, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
September 18, 2016	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 18, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito?

Current status: Good article

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Espanto II is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Espanto II/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 23:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note This review is part of a series of reviews by an editor on articles of a similar topic. Because of this, the various reviews may reference each other. Please also see Los Espantos, Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Espanto Jr., Espanto Jr. (CMLL), and Los Hijos del Espanto if things are unclear. Disclosure: Both the nom and reviewer are participating in the WikiCup, if need be, anyone may request a second opinion if they feel my review is not following the GA criteria. Thanks. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 23:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round two, let's go:

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

"(Escuela México)" Same question as on Talk:Espanto I/GA1
Removed
"As El Espanto he would wear an all black and white ring gear..." Is this the correct way to phrase this? I would put it as "he would wear an all black and white ring gear" but I'm unsure if this is the way ring gear is talked about.
I think "an" should be removed, so I did ;-)
"A couple of months later El Santo would unmask Espanto I" The prose here is a little unencyclopedic and imprecise. Is there an estimate of how many months? If not, I can't fault you for that, but if there's something more precise that would be preferred.
Unfortunately the Espanto II match does not have a date in any source I can find, only "1963", one said summer but that's as close as I could get so "a couple of months" is as close as I could get.

Having read all three at this point, I feel like Los Espantos, Espanto I, and Espanto II should probably be merged. The amount of novel information on each one of them is rather limited, and the three articles have very heavy overlap. This is not part of the GA criteria and so is not going to factor into the review, but I think it's something to think about.

I started out with just Los Espantos, but then got into details of their "pre-Espanto" career and Espanto II/III's career after Espanto I's death and I spun them into seperate articles as I was writing and researching, to allow each article to be more focused.

Results

On hold for a to be determined time. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 02:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wugapodes: - Addressed the issues, and comment on the overlap. MPJ-US 03:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passed Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 03:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]