Talk:Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten! BWV 172/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Will review within 72 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Wondering why Thomaskantor and Konzertmeister are italicized. I gather this is the convention in your articles but I was wondering why?
- I understand that all foreign language terms should be italicized. I don't do it for things in quotation marks, such as the titles of hymns, but the titles (first lines) of the movements.
- "Christoph Wolff suggests that Bach may have studied in Weimar musical settings available in the court library" do you mean books about musical settings?
- No, musical scores, if I understand the source right.
- Delink second instance of Gospel of John per OVERLINK.
- Done. However, the links to verses will always be blue.
- In scoring you use words for number but use "movement 5", was this intentional? Ideally they should be consistent of course!
- I looked at it and hope I consistently use now "first" and "second" as words, but "movement 5".
- Any reason why F major isn't linked in the table and C and A minor are? I'd link it there and remove the links to A minor and F underneath in the text.
- Only reason: the table was created the latest ;) - done as you said.
- Can you add a few citations to the recordings section? Ideally the red links should be filled too ;-]
- all Bach cantatas, ref added, - I know someone who fills red links ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done so far, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job, looks adequate for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)