Talk:Ernie Toshack with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Love the hair. Will review soon Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 01:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall the article's pretty good, here's what I'd like to see fixed though:

"They were eventually out for 189, 363 runs in arrears and were forced to follow on." Either link "runs in arrears" or explain it, since i don't get that term at all.
"On the second day, the Australian lower order counter-attacked and Toshack joined Johnston with the score at 9/320 and they put on 30 more runs before Johnston was stumped." Any possibility of the redlinked "stumped" turning blue? If not no big deal though it'd be nice.
The Third Test article feels kinda short. If he was barely playing in the test then that would explain it, though if that's the case it should be a little clearer.

I'll put the article on hold, though there's very little to fix. Wizardman 17:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Third Test was heavily interrupted by rain so Toshack basically only played half the bgame. I've fixed the others. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 23:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Wizardman 01:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]