Talk:Ernesto Araújo
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ernesto Araújo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Conspiracy theorists
[edit]He is definitely qualified for that category: "On his blog, Araújo has also claimed that climate change is a "cultural Marxism" plot". But unless reliable sources call him a conspiracy theorist, I fear we can't. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- There isn't a single WP:RS that I've found that calls Araujo a "conspiracy theorist" or which describes his views as "conspiracy theories" (not even The Guardian). It would be WP:OR and WP:SYNTH for us to add the label without reliable sources describing him as such, and would also be a WP:BLP violation because of the very negative connotation of being a "conspiracy theorist." --1990'sguy (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Awkward Introduction
[edit]Why exactly is his political subscriptions the first thing mentioned on this article versus, for instance the George Walker Bush article? A serious reader or researcher is not particularly interested in how westerners view this character, but is rather interested in an impartial informative article with hard facts rather than an essay of how the author feels. This article is riddled with opinion pieces than it is with anything informative. Please inspire from older versions of wikipedia articles dating to the early 2000’s 206.176.151.127 (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Start-Class Brazil articles
- Low-importance Brazil articles
- Start-Class government and laws of Brazil articles
- Low-importance government and laws of Brazil articles
- Government and laws of Brazil task force articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- Start-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles