This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
@Grayfell: I removed your addition of this content to the lead. I recall this content was already in the body of the article. Please explain here why you think that shapeshift corporate content is due in the lead of this WP:BLP. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The lead summarizes the body of the article. The article passed AFD due to these sources (per your own comments on that discussion). The lead should indicate why a person is notable enough for an article, because that's the purpose of an encyclopedia article. Intentionally downplaying the reason this person has an article at all is indistinguishable from PR. As I've explained to you many, many times, summarize what reliable sources are actually saying. Grayfell (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to WP:CRYBLP, abandoning this discussion and going straight to ANI really seems like an attempt to game the system. Your edits seem like an attempt to promote this person and legitimize their cryptocurrency schemes. As you already know, Wikipedia isn't a platform for public relations. Grayfell (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Moem-Meom: Way too much for LEAD, I moved into article body. Summarize all this in a sentence if you want. See this MOS:LEAD: "The lead should identify the topic and summarize the body of the article with appropriate weight." This article doesnt provide a summary of another article as well (eg Shapeshift. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
