Jump to content

Talk:Eric Kessler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Resources

[edit]

Some WP:RS

18:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.17.113 (talk)

We can all Google news sources as easily as anyone. Which ones of those actually provide significant coverage about the Eric Kessler in this article? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they all do because I read them 69.181.17.113 (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So did I, and no they don't. You haven't answered the question. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Going to note that "https://capitalresearch.org/article/excavating-arabellas-origin-part-3/" (#5), while it provides some information, appears to be a hardcore libertarian organization that invites people from the Heritage Foundation for talks. "https://www.wccsradio.com/rss/dc-attorney-general-targets-conservative-judicial-activist-leonard-leos-network-politically-driven/" (#1) is a 404 not even mentioned on the internet archive. #2,#3,#4 appear to be about related topics. #7 (Source Watch) is a wiki that exclusively quotes a non-independent source. #8 (InfluenceWatch) is a better-formatted wiki that appears to be written by the aforementioned hardcore libertarian Capital Research. Then there is a HuffPost article author bio (#9), a team member bio by The Global Fight (#10), a past board member bio (#11), a tiny autogenerated investment profile (#12), an org bio (#13), literally a pdf on InfluenceWatch of #6 (see below), and an internet archive of #6 (see below).
The only possible sources here are the Capital Research article, and the interview by Worth Magazine (#6) ("https://worth.com/contributor/be-the-change/") The first is questionable; the second is clearly a significant reliable source, but given 2 of them are just duplicates I'm pretty sure this person did not read all 13 of these sources. Mrfoogles (talk) 08:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resources colorado

[edit]

69.181.17.113 (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can all Google news sources as easily as anyone. Which ones of those actually provide significant coverage about the Eric Kessler in this article? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they all do because I read them 69.181.17.113 (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These appear to be: 2 old news articles from 1990, a library index that no one here can access, two trivial mentions related to environmentalism, another trivial mention where he received a campus award, and another trivial mention related to an event announcement. Mrfoogles (talk) 08:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resources chicago

[edit]

69.181.17.113 (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can all Google news sources as easily as anyone. Which ones of those actually provide significant coverage about the Eric Kessler in this article? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they all do because I read them 69.181.17.113 (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These are:
  • An about us page
  • Non-independent
  • About FelPro, does not mention him
  • About FelPro, does not mention him
  • Org chart
  • Death of sombody who *may* be his dad?
  • Same again?
  • Also doesn't mention him
  • Also doesn't mention him
  • Also doesn't mention him
  • 1989 article about someone with the same name trying to save whales
  • Possible 1989 photo of him
  • Trivial mention of possibly him (unlikely)
  • Same again
  • Same again
None are usable Mrfoogles (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resources GEORGETOWN

[edit]

69.181.17.113 (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

69.181.17.113 (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of those provide only trivial mentions and/or aren't even about this article subject. Anyone can get a dump of links from a web search. That is meaningless. Please identify which sources actually provide significant coverage of the Eric Kessler in this article. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they all do because I read them 69.181.17.113 (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, you didn't read them, else you wouldn't have listed trivial mentions. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"New Venture Fund is led by a board of directors that includes President Eric Kessler, a former national field director for the League of Conservation Voters and White House appointee who helped manage conservation issues during the Clinton administration. Kessler owns a few popular D.C. restaurants, including G, Graffiato and Kapnos. Other staffers and board members have been affiliated with the conservation group ecoAmerica." (https://www.eenews.net/articles/dem-strategist-takes-on-oil-industry-despite-the-odds/) may be possibly him, but it's barely beyond a trivial mention. I did not think he was a restaurant owner. I assume the numerous other restaurant sources are based on the idea that this is him, so they would be useful if it was him.
Other than that the only thing I could find that could possibly be useful was an event listing, which I did not read in its entirety but likely would not be a good source anyways. Mrfoogles (talk) 08:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]