Talk:Eric Brill

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Home page -> Photograph ?

Small note to 131.107.0.96 who kindly pointed to the current home-page: Eric, if that's you, who you also be as kind as to provide a photograph under a Free licence ? Thank you very much, I love your work ! :) Rama 21:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion

A quick google search shows many sites discussing Brills move from his poition as head of Microsofts adCentre to his post at ebay as vice president of research. The fact that the article has not been expanded for 20 months does not show that it is unexpandable. The move from Microsoft to ebay gained enough attention to assert notability so I went ahead and removed the tag proposing the article for deletion as it just needs more work. Weakopedia (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not in citation

"and was quoted in 2004 as predicting only brief success for Google's search engine business"

This is not in the citation as I read it. He was saying that search in general, while not short of money, could end up being commoditized; and that Google's current document-centric approach was vulnerable to new, improved, Microsoft-wins-again vapourware. That second point was standard Microsoft rhetoric of the era, and it's not to Brill's credit that he regurgitated the party line. — MaxEnt 06:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]