Talk:Erdas Imagine
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 September 2016. The result of the discussion was merge to Hexagon AB. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]apparently the ERDAS about-the-company page got deleted, leaving red ink behind on a number of wiki pages. 122.57.228.152 (talk) 04:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- That article has never existed. If it did, there would be a pink rectangle stating when it was deleted, when you access the redlink. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 04:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was not moved. Per below, there is no substantiation for the claim that Erdas is an acronym. As for imagine, we "follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting 'official'".--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Erdas Imagine → ERDAS IMAGINE – ERDAS is an acronym, and should thus be capitalized. IMAGINE is also capitalized as a product name. See http://www.erdas.com/products/ERDASIMAGINE/ERDASIMAGINE/Details.aspx and http://www.acronymia.com/ERDAS Keith134 (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose you haven't proven that "IMAGINE" is an acryonym or that acronymia.com's ERDAS is the same as the ERDAS at erdas.com ; Further MOS:CAPS and MOS:TM -- why should we capitalize a nonacronym like IMAGINE? 70.24.251.208 (talk) 04:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per our guidelines listed on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks, we should follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of company or the trademark owners. In addition, I also do not see anything on that web site that explicitly says that it is an acronym. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks.--ukexpat (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks. 89.100.207.51 (talk) 16:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Erdas Imagine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140610063245/http://erdas.sterlinggeo.com/ to http://erdas.sterlinggeo.com/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.gis.usu.edu/unix/imagine/SML.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)