Talk:Eocarcinosoma/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
- Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
- Neutrality: The article is neutral.
- Stability: The article is stable.
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. | Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body. | Pass
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | Sources used are reliable. | Pass
|
| (c) (original research) | No original research found. | Pass
|
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No flagrant copyright issues found. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The article broadly covers all major aspects. | Pass
|
| (b) (focused) | The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Use and caption are good. | Pass
|