Talk:Environmental impacts of sterile food packaging

This environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles

Food and drink

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Original research an notability

I have concerns that this article is failing Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Notability policies. It seems an original synthesis of sources, not a single one of which discuses the topic of "environmental impacts of sterile food packaging". In other words, it is a synthesis of two groups of sources, one that discusses food packaging, and another one that discusses environmental impacts of chemicals. But I don't see a source that discusses both, lending this topic notability. Thoughts? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is no longer an issue with this article. It had been broadened and put into context, and the subject is a notable one. When billions of packages are dumped or burnt causing possibly severe problems, I think that is worth noting! In any case with something like this, which is a problem regarding a recent innovation, of course it is going to be "original research". Somebody has to come up with it. All articles on Wikipedia are an "original synthesis of sources". This is something that ought to be encouraged if Wikipedia is not going to be fossilised and irrelevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.178.20.46 (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/ready-to-eat-food-market; Ricardo Simpson (2009). Engineering Aspects of Thermal Food Processing, page 250; https://bestinpackaging.com/2013/07/28/flexible-packaging-and-its-recycling-problems/; http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/; http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/5/1/1/htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The site (www.futuremarketinsights.com) has also been systematically spammed and is not a reliable source for any kind of information. GermanJoe (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]