Talk:Enter the Gungeon/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 00:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
I've actually played this game quite a lot, so while I don't normally touch video game articles, I figured I might take a crack at it.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- I consulted WP:VGRS to make sure that every source cited was considered reputable for the sake of video game articles, and all of them passed.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I feel the major points are sufficiently addressed. My only question would be if you could elaborate on the "Kill the past" thing.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Good work! I'm a big fan of this game so I'm glad to see it getting some attention here.
- Pass/Fail: