Talk:Enquiry into the Cost of the National Health Service
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Perhaps the primary title should be Guillebaud Report, if that is what most people would be searching for, per WP:TITLE— Preceding unsigned comment added by Animalparty (talk • contribs)
- Thanks for the Wikiproject tag. There were two Guillebaud Reports at about the same time period, one into the National Health Service and one into the UK's national railway system, so I'm not attached to the present title but I've chosen it because it uniquely identifies the article subject, and "Guillebaud Report" wouldn't. Cheers, MartinPoulter Jisc (talk) 16:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Consulting WP:TITLE as recommended, I agree you're right, though eventually Guillebaud Report will have to be a disambiguation page for the two reports commonly known by that name, which raises the question of what this page's title should be. MartinPoulter (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)