Talk:Enhanced Transparency Framework

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 April 2020 by reviewer Gpkp (talk · contribs).

Most of former ‘outlook’ section

I moved the below here as not sure useful nowadays.

Whether the Transparency Framework can actually contribute to an increase in climate policy ambition, as set out under the Paris Agreement regime, will depend to a large extent on its application in practice. Will Parties actually fulfil their reporting obligations? And if so, how will they interpret the existing requirements? Although the Conference of the Parties in Katowice in 2018 indicated a great willingness on the part of the international community to ensure greater transparency by agreeing the implementation rules, the weak outcome of the negotiations at the Climate Change Conference in Madrid in 2019 indicates otherwise. For example, at COP25 Parties failed to further specify the transparency requirements by establishing uniform reporting structures and tables. Well-known differences between industrialised countries, which called for greater transparency, and large emerging economies, which were opposed to overly-specific reporting requirements, came to light once again.^[1] To enable robust and the most accurate reporting possible from 2024 onwards, these points of contention so relevant to implementation must be resolved in time for the next climate conference which will be held in Glasgow at the end of 2020. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Obergassel, W.; Arens, C.; Beuermann, C.; Hermwille, L.; Kreibich, N.; Ott, H.; & Spitzner, M. (2019), Time for Action – Blocked and Postponed — A first assessment of COP25 in Madrid.

Statement that Paris Agreement legally binding - should it be removed?

https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/pa/pa.html says NDCs not legally binding. But I am not sure as maybe the Swiss judgement makes them binding? Chidgk1 (talk) 18:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Obergassel, W.; Arens, C.; Beuermann, C.; Hermwille, L.; Kreibich, N.; Ott, H.; & Spitzner, M. (2019), Time for Action – Blocked and Postponed — A first assessment of COP25 in Madrid.

[1]