Jump to content

Talk:England First Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


England First Party - External Links

[edit]

The article contains an external link linking to a site that is completely biased against the party and contains many facts that are not backed up with any hard evidence and most alarmingly an accusation of theft against the party's chairman of $100,000 without any concrete evidence apart from a more than likely forged email which is supposed to authenticate it. The site concerned is openly hostile to the party and is hosted by company connected to a rival political party hence the hostility of the article. I could go in to lengthy detail about the inappropriateness of the inclusion of the link. I note other entries for parties sharing a similar viewpoint don’t have external links pointing to sites that are hostile to their viewpoint. I would grateful if you could advise the policy to remove this link which I feel breaches numerous conditions with relation to the accuracy, unbiased and fairness of the entry. I've tried editing but was advised I couldn’t so please advise me of the proper procedure.

84.13.75.167 19:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The external link concerned stems from an internal row within the BNP, and was produced by a man who was convicted of bombing a school in South Africa.

I am very surprised that Wikipedia even considered publishing a link to such a source.

84.67.207.34 23:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Religion

[edit]

Public displays by religions not of European origin would be banned. So, as Christianity hails from the middle east, this party must want to ban Christianity. You have to laugh..... 89.168.28.45 22:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

[edit]

I must say some of the slander against the party is bias. I recommend that instead of badmouthing the party, to provide evidence that what Wiki is saying is true. Thus stated in the "Religion" area of discussion, there is no authentic source.

> This has now been referenced

Compulsory vs. Voluntary repatriation

[edit]

Doesn't EFP support a policy of compulsory repatriation for non-white Britons, as the BNP did until a few years ago?

Do they really call for a ban on interracial marriages?

[edit]

If not then the statement that they do should be removed. It seems a very extreme position and even the BNP don't openly call for this Irisismykid (talk) 20:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As unbelievable as it sounds it appears to have been part of their manifesto at one point. The statement was sourced but had a broken link, which I have now fixed. Road Wizard (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on England First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on England First Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:England_First_Party&oldid=1216506613"