Talk:Engkanto

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2008. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

A fact from Engkanto appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 6,200 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Engkanto, a Philippine mythical creature, might be based on early encounters with European friars?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/June.

Wikipedia

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

````engkanto was based on Filipino folklore and no links available when we search it last June 19 2008. Page is awfully worded upon documenting it for the main reason that it is a group knowledge and experience regarding the subject matter. The references thats been added and provided on this page was relevant and usefull. ````Although some documents or enterpretation is not clear and still need discussion. The best and convinient way is just add a diffrent interpretation or research and not editing the first document to provide different scope of knowledge and research on the subject matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L2ipp3l2 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles have to be based on reliable sources WP:RS. Your original article had no sources and so has been re-written by several editors to include sources. The original article was also not written in good English and so required a complete re-write. I tried to include as mcuh of the original content as I could where I could find reliable sources. This page is now the consensus of several editors so please don't blank again, but rather continue discussion here. Dpmuk (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that this page is awfully worded and needs a lot of work but believe the subject is one for wikipedia and there is just enough information contained to warrant keeping. Dpmuk (talk) 12:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will work on tiding in the next hour or so. Dpmuk (talk) 12:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot remove Speedy Delete tags -- that is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only a violation if it's a page I created myself - which this isn't. Dpmuk (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference here: The Engkanto Belief: An Essay in Interpretation Francisco Demetrio Asian Folklore Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1 (1969), pp. 77-90

And here: Ideas of Power in the Philippines: Amulets and Sacrifice Axel Borchgrevink Cultural Dynamics, 2003

I believe this is enough to warrant keeping page - it seems a genuine topic. Dpmuk (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, not the next hour or so but now edited. Dpmuk (talk) 01:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Engkanto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416193040/http://www.basr.ac.uk:80/diskus/diskus8/Tremlett.htm to http://www.basr.ac.uk/diskus/diskus8/Tremlett.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]