Talk:Engineering fit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Engineering fit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

why would you use the word obviate and link to wiktionary? doesn't that suggest there's a better word to use? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.207.40.172 (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. Sometimes an apt word is an apt word. And when it's most apt, it's the only word needed (versus using several others in order to avoid using that one alone). The link is there for any readers who need it. God forbid anyone learn a simple thing (like 9th grade vocabulary) from reading an encyclopedia, right? — ¾-10 00:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]