Talk:Enforcers (comics)

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Marvel Team-Up#Marvel Team-Up|Marvel Team-Up]] The anchor (#Marvel Team-Up) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Separate articles merge survey

Merge- Both articles lack detail and neither character currently has an identity outside of the Enforcers in comics or other media.66.109.248.114 00:23, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Additionally, I doubt that there's enough material to sustain a full article. --GentlemanGhost 22:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I added the stubs for Hammer Harrison and Snake Marston (comics) to the merge requests. --GentlemanGhost 22:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As making the original merge purposal, I agree with the two additions. I recommend articles be merged and listified in the article.66.109.248.114 00:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that Hammer Harrison and Snake Marston do have some history outside of the Enforcers, although the current articles do not yet reflect this. See the Marvel Universe Appendix entries for more details. 24.136.11.242 02:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I support such an merge. I don't know why there is nothing done about it. The only article of the members that I think is useful is Ox (comics) because he has been afilliated with other characters. But just about every article (defianetly the ones that aren't original members) would be better off merged here then as an stub class article on their own. Plus the only reason why they are notable is being an member of the Enforcers and thus is the reason why they belong in here which is following the guideline of Wikipedia:Notability. Jhenderson777 (talk) 19:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DD102 cvr.jpg

Image:DD102 cvr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]