Talk:Energy efficiency in transport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Energy efficiency in transport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport High‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment: Sustainability High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Section sizes

Section size for Energy efficiency in transport (45 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	2,784	2,784
Units of measurement	2,992	5,435
Typical conversions into SI unit	878	878
Liquid fuels	962	962
Electricity	236	236
Food energy	367	367
Land Passenger Transport	33	11,494
Table Overview	11,461	11,461
Land transport means	27	41,749
Walking	971	971
Velomobile	1,388	1,388
Bicycle	1,959	1,959
Motorised bicycle	948	948
Electric kick scooter	1,268	1,268
Electric Unicycle	829	829
Automobiles	3,450	15,535
Common efficiency measures	979	979
Life-cycle energy use	4,572	4,572
Example consumption figures	6,534	6,534
Trains	9,311	15,682
Freight	1,230	1,230
Passenger	4,105	4,105
Braking losses	1,036	1,036
Buses	2,502	2,502
Other	640	640
Air transport means	26	12,704
Aircraft	10,369	12,678
Small aircraft	2,309	2,309
Water transport means	29	3,071
Ships	15	3,042
Queen Elizabeth	774	774
Cruise ships	441	441
Emma Maersk	1,120	1,120
Boats	692	692
International transport comparisons	95	10,635
European Public transport	2,207	2,207
US Passenger transport	1,957	1,957
US Freight transport	3,258	3,258
Canadian transport	876	876
French environmental calculator	1,450	1,450
German environmental costs	792	792
Note - External costs not included above	839	839
See also	590	590
Footnotes	43	43
External links	1,115	1,115
Total	90,459	90,459

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

broken link to us energy guidebook

maybe someone with more time can follow up on this...

I don't have the time to find all the references & correct them but i went looking for this reference, which is cited at least twice.

edition 28 appears to be gone, edition 30 is available at: http://cta.ornl.gov/data/index.shtml

US government-produced data should be reproducible so perhaps a copy should be downloaded to wikipedia for future reference.

data

best case samples

best 4-seat car : peugeot 208 1.6 litre BlueHDi, NEDC 3.0 litres per 100 kilometres (78 mpg_‑US) [1] : 0.75 L/100 km per seat
best 5-seat car : peugeot 308 1.6 litre BlueHDi, NEDC 3.1 litres per 100 kilometres (76 mpg_‑US) [2] : 0.62 L/100 km per seat
best 7-seat car : Citroen Grand C4 Picasso e-HDi 90 Airdream, NEDC 3.8 litres per 100 kilometres (62 mpg_‑US) [3] : 0.54 L/100 km per seat
best 9-place minivan : Renault - Trafic III - 1.6 dCi, NEDC 5.7 litres per 100 kilometres (41 mpg_‑US) [4] : 0.63 L/100 km per seat

"Occupancy rates of passenger vehicles". European Environment Agency. Jul 2010.

Greyhound Canada fuel consumption : 110 kilometres per litre (0.91 l/100 km) per passenger ("Facts & Figures". Greyhound Canada.)

reference 49 not working

Reference 49 links to nowhere, it supposedly is the source for the 150 kJ per passenger per km train number, and I would like to check it.

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP23 - Sect 201 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 77xsy (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by 77xsy (talk) 23:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automobiles section reads like an argumentative essay

Howdy y'all. To avoid drive-by tagging I'm bringing this up on the talk page before implementing any tags.

The current automobiles section reads like an argumentative essay, specifically with the way it is structured, with the paragraph structure, each paragraph introduced numerically, all of them being "considerations," and the final paragraph starting with "finally." It reads less like an encyclopedia and more like one essay, which you're supposed to read from start to finish, building up a kind of "story" over time rather than organizing the information into disconnected-but-organized sections which you can jump to as necessary.

I don't know if I described it very well, but if you read the section and put it into the context of a school essay, you'll see what I'm talking about. What do y'all think about rewriting the section or, at least, adding an essay-like tag? Pie GGuy (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did some quick rewrite, hope this helps. It can be improved of course. --Ita140188 (talk) 08:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]